No matter your root level analysis, if it's going to do any good, you're going to make it public. publish it.

No matter your root level analysis, if it's going to fairly exist in anyone else's mind for consideration, you're going to have to formulate it in some kind of communicable form - after all, the point of articulating anything, presumably, is to test it with others & persuade them

No matter your root level analysis, if it's going to fairly exist in anyone else's mind for consideration, it has got to be mindful of the medium in which it's stored…

Within society,

Robert McChesney

“Regardless of what a progressive group’s first issue of importance is, its second issue should be media and communication, because so long as the media are in corporate hands, the task of social change will be vastly more difficult, if not impossible across the board.”

some notion of the public ownership of the airwaves, electromagnetic frequencies (wagon trail through the air? was smith musing on radio? or carrier pidgin? other one)

The key specific element I don't see represented in the Git process is an issue Nelson didn’t have to face: in a permissionless system, how do you deal with the potential incoming spam of others quoting your writing? Having to lock up sats to maintain a transclusion? I believe such a mechanism is possible without resorting to some trusted moderator or reputation system. This is how I see Hyperbitcoinization being realized, as the outcome of best practices being practiced.